Washington DC
New York
Toronto
Distribution: (800) 510 9863
Press ID
  • Login
Binghamton Herald
Advertisement
Thursday, July 2, 2026
  • Home
  • World
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Technology
  • Culture
  • Health
  • Entertainment
  • Trending
No Result
View All Result
Binghamton Herald
No Result
View All Result
Home Politics

Your guide to Measure A: Sales tax to fund homelessness programs

by Binghamton Herald Report
October 3, 2024
in Politics
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

The measure specifies that 60% of the proceeds would go to the county for homeless services. Of that, at least 15% would be allocated to cities, councils of government and unincorporated areas based on the annual point-in-time homeless count conducted by the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority. At least 1.65% would go to an innovation fund to test new ideas for future, larger-scale programs.

The remaining 40% would largely be dedicated to housing production. The largest chunk, 35.75%, would go to the newly formed Los Angeles County Affordable Housing Solutions Agency to fund the development of affordable housing. The Los Angeles County Development Authority would receive 3%, and 1.25% would be set aside for accountability, data and research.

The measure specifies that 60% of the proceeds would go to the county for homeless services. Of that, at least 15% would be allocated to cities, councils of government and unincorporated areas based on the annual point-in-time homeless count conducted by the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority. At least 1.65% would go to an innovation fund to test new ideas for future, larger-scale programs.

The remaining 40% would largely be dedicated to housing production. The largest chunk, 35.75%, would go to the newly formed Los Angeles County Affordable Housing Solutions Agency to fund the development of affordable housing. The Los Angeles County Development Authority would receive 3%, and 1.25% would be set aside for accountability, data and research.

The measure specifies that 60% of the proceeds would go to the county for homeless services. Of that, at least 15% would be allocated to cities, councils of government and unincorporated areas based on the annual point-in-time homeless count conducted by the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority. At least 1.65% would go to an innovation fund to test new ideas for future, larger-scale programs.

The remaining 40% would largely be dedicated to housing production. The largest chunk, 35.75%, would go to the newly formed Los Angeles County Affordable Housing Solutions Agency to fund the development of affordable housing. The Los Angeles County Development Authority would receive 3%, and 1.25% would be set aside for accountability, data and research.

The measure specifies that 60% of the proceeds would go to the county for homeless services. Of that, at least 15% would be allocated to cities, councils of government and unincorporated areas based on the annual point-in-time homeless count conducted by the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority. At least 1.65% would go to an innovation fund to test new ideas for future, larger-scale programs.

The remaining 40% would largely be dedicated to housing production. The largest chunk, 35.75%, would go to the newly formed Los Angeles County Affordable Housing Solutions Agency to fund the development of affordable housing. The Los Angeles County Development Authority would receive 3%, and 1.25% would be set aside for accountability, data and research.

The measure specifies that 60% of the proceeds would go to the county for homeless services. Of that, at least 15% would be allocated to cities, councils of government and unincorporated areas based on the annual point-in-time homeless count conducted by the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority. At least 1.65% would go to an innovation fund to test new ideas for future, larger-scale programs.

The remaining 40% would largely be dedicated to housing production. The largest chunk, 35.75%, would go to the newly formed Los Angeles County Affordable Housing Solutions Agency to fund the development of affordable housing. The Los Angeles County Development Authority would receive 3%, and 1.25% would be set aside for accountability, data and research.

The measure specifies that 60% of the proceeds would go to the county for homeless services. Of that, at least 15% would be allocated to cities, councils of government and unincorporated areas based on the annual point-in-time homeless count conducted by the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority. At least 1.65% would go to an innovation fund to test new ideas for future, larger-scale programs.

The remaining 40% would largely be dedicated to housing production. The largest chunk, 35.75%, would go to the newly formed Los Angeles County Affordable Housing Solutions Agency to fund the development of affordable housing. The Los Angeles County Development Authority would receive 3%, and 1.25% would be set aside for accountability, data and research.

The measure specifies that 60% of the proceeds would go to the county for homeless services. Of that, at least 15% would be allocated to cities, councils of government and unincorporated areas based on the annual point-in-time homeless count conducted by the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority. At least 1.65% would go to an innovation fund to test new ideas for future, larger-scale programs.

The remaining 40% would largely be dedicated to housing production. The largest chunk, 35.75%, would go to the newly formed Los Angeles County Affordable Housing Solutions Agency to fund the development of affordable housing. The Los Angeles County Development Authority would receive 3%, and 1.25% would be set aside for accountability, data and research.

The measure specifies that 60% of the proceeds would go to the county for homeless services. Of that, at least 15% would be allocated to cities, councils of government and unincorporated areas based on the annual point-in-time homeless count conducted by the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority. At least 1.65% would go to an innovation fund to test new ideas for future, larger-scale programs.

The remaining 40% would largely be dedicated to housing production. The largest chunk, 35.75%, would go to the newly formed Los Angeles County Affordable Housing Solutions Agency to fund the development of affordable housing. The Los Angeles County Development Authority would receive 3%, and 1.25% would be set aside for accountability, data and research.

Previous Post

Your guide to California’s state Senate District 37 race: Choi vs. Newman

Next Post

Your guide to California’s Assembly District 52 race: Caloza vs. Carrillo

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

BROWSE BY CATEGORIES

  • Business
  • Culture
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Politics
  • Technology
  • Trending
  • Uncategorized
  • World
Binghamton Herald

© 2024 Binghamton Herald or its affiliated companies.

Navigate Site

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Contact

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • World
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Technology
  • Culture
  • Health
  • Entertainment
  • Trending

© 2024 Binghamton Herald or its affiliated companies.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In