Uncertainty continues to surround the proposed US-Iran peace deal as analysts and officials question whether it will hold beyond the expected signing on 19 June. Experts believe the reported draft appears to favour Iran, with provisions such as the release of frozen assets, possible sanctions relief, and discussions on compensation for war-related losses. Iran has also insisted that control over the Strait of Hormuz remains its sovereign right. Commentators argue that neither the United States nor Israel achieved a decisive victory during the conflict, strengthening Iran’s negotiating position. They suggest economic pressures pushed Tehran toward negotiations rather than military defeat. At the same time, observers describe President Donald Trump as seeking a practical exit from the conflict while balancing strategic and commercial interests. Debate also continues over Israel’s role, with analysts saying tensions between Israel and Iran remain unresolved regardless of the US-Iran talks. Despite optimism about diplomacy, repeated threats and conflicting statements from all sides indicate that the final outcome of the agreement remains uncertain.
