The city of Los Angeles is exploring what would happen if the minimum wage of workers on residential construction projects was raised to more than $32 an hour.
At Tuesday morning’s City Council meeting, Councilmembers Curren Price and Hugo Soto-Martínez introduced a motion to commission a study on the effects of establishing a $32.35 minimum wage for all construction projects in the city with 10 or more residential units and under 85 feet in height.
The study would also analyze the effect of an additional healthcare credit of $7.65 per hour for construction workers on these projects.
The motion argues that lifting the floor on wages and benefits is necessary to attract workers amid pressures on the city to rebuild units lost during the Palisades fire — and as the industry hemorrhages workers leaving due to fears of immigration raids.
The motion already has sign-on from six council members: Bob Blumenfield, Heather Hutt, Eunisses Hernandez and Ysabel Jurado in addition to Price and Soto-Martínez.
A coalition of construction unions and housing groups including Abundant Housing LA and Housing Action Coalition has voiced its support for a wage increase.
Backers say that wage boosts are necessary to protect construction workers in the residential sector who are often non-union, foreign-born, and hired through multilayered contracting that makes them more vulnerable to wage theft and exploitation.
“These are workers who can’t afford a roof over their head, yet we rely on them to build the roofs over our own,” Pete Rodriguez, western district vice president of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters, said in a statement.
Some construction projects already require union-level pay, known as a “prevailing wage,” and benefits. Those projects would be exempt under the proposal.
Stuart Waldman, president of the Valley Industry and Commerce Assn., called the proposal “absolute insanity,” saying it would hurt a city already struggling to produce much-needed housing. Apartment developers already have been steering clear of L.A., in part due to Measure ULA, the voter-approved tax increase on high-end real estate sales, he said.
“This will drive what little construction we have out of L.A.,” Waldman added.
The council members’ proposal follows a recent battle over raising wages for hotel and airport workers in the city. Business groups fought to repeal the city’s $30 minimum wage for tourism workers but in early September fell short of securing the minimum number of valid signatures needed to qualify their initiative for the ballot.
Times staff writer David Zahniser contributed to this report.
The city of Los Angeles is exploring what would happen if the minimum wage of workers on residential construction projects was raised to more than $32 an hour.
At Tuesday morning’s City Council meeting, Councilmembers Curren Price and Hugo Soto-Martínez introduced a motion to commission a study on the effects of establishing a $32.35 minimum wage for all construction projects in the city with 10 or more residential units and under 85 feet in height.
The study would also analyze the effect of an additional healthcare credit of $7.65 per hour for construction workers on these projects.
The motion argues that lifting the floor on wages and benefits is necessary to attract workers amid pressures on the city to rebuild units lost during the Palisades fire — and as the industry hemorrhages workers leaving due to fears of immigration raids.
The motion already has sign-on from six council members: Bob Blumenfield, Heather Hutt, Eunisses Hernandez and Ysabel Jurado in addition to Price and Soto-Martínez.
A coalition of construction unions and housing groups including Abundant Housing LA and Housing Action Coalition has voiced its support for a wage increase.
Backers say that wage boosts are necessary to protect construction workers in the residential sector who are often non-union, foreign-born, and hired through multilayered contracting that makes them more vulnerable to wage theft and exploitation.
“These are workers who can’t afford a roof over their head, yet we rely on them to build the roofs over our own,” Pete Rodriguez, western district vice president of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters, said in a statement.
Some construction projects already require union-level pay, known as a “prevailing wage,” and benefits. Those projects would be exempt under the proposal.
Stuart Waldman, president of the Valley Industry and Commerce Assn., called the proposal “absolute insanity,” saying it would hurt a city already struggling to produce much-needed housing. Apartment developers already have been steering clear of L.A., in part due to Measure ULA, the voter-approved tax increase on high-end real estate sales, he said.
“This will drive what little construction we have out of L.A.,” Waldman added.
The council members’ proposal follows a recent battle over raising wages for hotel and airport workers in the city. Business groups fought to repeal the city’s $30 minimum wage for tourism workers but in early September fell short of securing the minimum number of valid signatures needed to qualify their initiative for the ballot.
Times staff writer David Zahniser contributed to this report.
The city of Los Angeles is exploring what would happen if the minimum wage of workers on residential construction projects was raised to more than $32 an hour.
At Tuesday morning’s City Council meeting, Councilmembers Curren Price and Hugo Soto-Martínez introduced a motion to commission a study on the effects of establishing a $32.35 minimum wage for all construction projects in the city with 10 or more residential units and under 85 feet in height.
The study would also analyze the effect of an additional healthcare credit of $7.65 per hour for construction workers on these projects.
The motion argues that lifting the floor on wages and benefits is necessary to attract workers amid pressures on the city to rebuild units lost during the Palisades fire — and as the industry hemorrhages workers leaving due to fears of immigration raids.
The motion already has sign-on from six council members: Bob Blumenfield, Heather Hutt, Eunisses Hernandez and Ysabel Jurado in addition to Price and Soto-Martínez.
A coalition of construction unions and housing groups including Abundant Housing LA and Housing Action Coalition has voiced its support for a wage increase.
Backers say that wage boosts are necessary to protect construction workers in the residential sector who are often non-union, foreign-born, and hired through multilayered contracting that makes them more vulnerable to wage theft and exploitation.
“These are workers who can’t afford a roof over their head, yet we rely on them to build the roofs over our own,” Pete Rodriguez, western district vice president of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters, said in a statement.
Some construction projects already require union-level pay, known as a “prevailing wage,” and benefits. Those projects would be exempt under the proposal.
Stuart Waldman, president of the Valley Industry and Commerce Assn., called the proposal “absolute insanity,” saying it would hurt a city already struggling to produce much-needed housing. Apartment developers already have been steering clear of L.A., in part due to Measure ULA, the voter-approved tax increase on high-end real estate sales, he said.
“This will drive what little construction we have out of L.A.,” Waldman added.
The council members’ proposal follows a recent battle over raising wages for hotel and airport workers in the city. Business groups fought to repeal the city’s $30 minimum wage for tourism workers but in early September fell short of securing the minimum number of valid signatures needed to qualify their initiative for the ballot.
Times staff writer David Zahniser contributed to this report.
The city of Los Angeles is exploring what would happen if the minimum wage of workers on residential construction projects was raised to more than $32 an hour.
At Tuesday morning’s City Council meeting, Councilmembers Curren Price and Hugo Soto-Martínez introduced a motion to commission a study on the effects of establishing a $32.35 minimum wage for all construction projects in the city with 10 or more residential units and under 85 feet in height.
The study would also analyze the effect of an additional healthcare credit of $7.65 per hour for construction workers on these projects.
The motion argues that lifting the floor on wages and benefits is necessary to attract workers amid pressures on the city to rebuild units lost during the Palisades fire — and as the industry hemorrhages workers leaving due to fears of immigration raids.
The motion already has sign-on from six council members: Bob Blumenfield, Heather Hutt, Eunisses Hernandez and Ysabel Jurado in addition to Price and Soto-Martínez.
A coalition of construction unions and housing groups including Abundant Housing LA and Housing Action Coalition has voiced its support for a wage increase.
Backers say that wage boosts are necessary to protect construction workers in the residential sector who are often non-union, foreign-born, and hired through multilayered contracting that makes them more vulnerable to wage theft and exploitation.
“These are workers who can’t afford a roof over their head, yet we rely on them to build the roofs over our own,” Pete Rodriguez, western district vice president of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters, said in a statement.
Some construction projects already require union-level pay, known as a “prevailing wage,” and benefits. Those projects would be exempt under the proposal.
Stuart Waldman, president of the Valley Industry and Commerce Assn., called the proposal “absolute insanity,” saying it would hurt a city already struggling to produce much-needed housing. Apartment developers already have been steering clear of L.A., in part due to Measure ULA, the voter-approved tax increase on high-end real estate sales, he said.
“This will drive what little construction we have out of L.A.,” Waldman added.
The council members’ proposal follows a recent battle over raising wages for hotel and airport workers in the city. Business groups fought to repeal the city’s $30 minimum wage for tourism workers but in early September fell short of securing the minimum number of valid signatures needed to qualify their initiative for the ballot.
Times staff writer David Zahniser contributed to this report.
The city of Los Angeles is exploring what would happen if the minimum wage of workers on residential construction projects was raised to more than $32 an hour.
At Tuesday morning’s City Council meeting, Councilmembers Curren Price and Hugo Soto-Martínez introduced a motion to commission a study on the effects of establishing a $32.35 minimum wage for all construction projects in the city with 10 or more residential units and under 85 feet in height.
The study would also analyze the effect of an additional healthcare credit of $7.65 per hour for construction workers on these projects.
The motion argues that lifting the floor on wages and benefits is necessary to attract workers amid pressures on the city to rebuild units lost during the Palisades fire — and as the industry hemorrhages workers leaving due to fears of immigration raids.
The motion already has sign-on from six council members: Bob Blumenfield, Heather Hutt, Eunisses Hernandez and Ysabel Jurado in addition to Price and Soto-Martínez.
A coalition of construction unions and housing groups including Abundant Housing LA and Housing Action Coalition has voiced its support for a wage increase.
Backers say that wage boosts are necessary to protect construction workers in the residential sector who are often non-union, foreign-born, and hired through multilayered contracting that makes them more vulnerable to wage theft and exploitation.
“These are workers who can’t afford a roof over their head, yet we rely on them to build the roofs over our own,” Pete Rodriguez, western district vice president of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters, said in a statement.
Some construction projects already require union-level pay, known as a “prevailing wage,” and benefits. Those projects would be exempt under the proposal.
Stuart Waldman, president of the Valley Industry and Commerce Assn., called the proposal “absolute insanity,” saying it would hurt a city already struggling to produce much-needed housing. Apartment developers already have been steering clear of L.A., in part due to Measure ULA, the voter-approved tax increase on high-end real estate sales, he said.
“This will drive what little construction we have out of L.A.,” Waldman added.
The council members’ proposal follows a recent battle over raising wages for hotel and airport workers in the city. Business groups fought to repeal the city’s $30 minimum wage for tourism workers but in early September fell short of securing the minimum number of valid signatures needed to qualify their initiative for the ballot.
Times staff writer David Zahniser contributed to this report.
The city of Los Angeles is exploring what would happen if the minimum wage of workers on residential construction projects was raised to more than $32 an hour.
At Tuesday morning’s City Council meeting, Councilmembers Curren Price and Hugo Soto-Martínez introduced a motion to commission a study on the effects of establishing a $32.35 minimum wage for all construction projects in the city with 10 or more residential units and under 85 feet in height.
The study would also analyze the effect of an additional healthcare credit of $7.65 per hour for construction workers on these projects.
The motion argues that lifting the floor on wages and benefits is necessary to attract workers amid pressures on the city to rebuild units lost during the Palisades fire — and as the industry hemorrhages workers leaving due to fears of immigration raids.
The motion already has sign-on from six council members: Bob Blumenfield, Heather Hutt, Eunisses Hernandez and Ysabel Jurado in addition to Price and Soto-Martínez.
A coalition of construction unions and housing groups including Abundant Housing LA and Housing Action Coalition has voiced its support for a wage increase.
Backers say that wage boosts are necessary to protect construction workers in the residential sector who are often non-union, foreign-born, and hired through multilayered contracting that makes them more vulnerable to wage theft and exploitation.
“These are workers who can’t afford a roof over their head, yet we rely on them to build the roofs over our own,” Pete Rodriguez, western district vice president of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters, said in a statement.
Some construction projects already require union-level pay, known as a “prevailing wage,” and benefits. Those projects would be exempt under the proposal.
Stuart Waldman, president of the Valley Industry and Commerce Assn., called the proposal “absolute insanity,” saying it would hurt a city already struggling to produce much-needed housing. Apartment developers already have been steering clear of L.A., in part due to Measure ULA, the voter-approved tax increase on high-end real estate sales, he said.
“This will drive what little construction we have out of L.A.,” Waldman added.
The council members’ proposal follows a recent battle over raising wages for hotel and airport workers in the city. Business groups fought to repeal the city’s $30 minimum wage for tourism workers but in early September fell short of securing the minimum number of valid signatures needed to qualify their initiative for the ballot.
Times staff writer David Zahniser contributed to this report.
The city of Los Angeles is exploring what would happen if the minimum wage of workers on residential construction projects was raised to more than $32 an hour.
At Tuesday morning’s City Council meeting, Councilmembers Curren Price and Hugo Soto-Martínez introduced a motion to commission a study on the effects of establishing a $32.35 minimum wage for all construction projects in the city with 10 or more residential units and under 85 feet in height.
The study would also analyze the effect of an additional healthcare credit of $7.65 per hour for construction workers on these projects.
The motion argues that lifting the floor on wages and benefits is necessary to attract workers amid pressures on the city to rebuild units lost during the Palisades fire — and as the industry hemorrhages workers leaving due to fears of immigration raids.
The motion already has sign-on from six council members: Bob Blumenfield, Heather Hutt, Eunisses Hernandez and Ysabel Jurado in addition to Price and Soto-Martínez.
A coalition of construction unions and housing groups including Abundant Housing LA and Housing Action Coalition has voiced its support for a wage increase.
Backers say that wage boosts are necessary to protect construction workers in the residential sector who are often non-union, foreign-born, and hired through multilayered contracting that makes them more vulnerable to wage theft and exploitation.
“These are workers who can’t afford a roof over their head, yet we rely on them to build the roofs over our own,” Pete Rodriguez, western district vice president of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters, said in a statement.
Some construction projects already require union-level pay, known as a “prevailing wage,” and benefits. Those projects would be exempt under the proposal.
Stuart Waldman, president of the Valley Industry and Commerce Assn., called the proposal “absolute insanity,” saying it would hurt a city already struggling to produce much-needed housing. Apartment developers already have been steering clear of L.A., in part due to Measure ULA, the voter-approved tax increase on high-end real estate sales, he said.
“This will drive what little construction we have out of L.A.,” Waldman added.
The council members’ proposal follows a recent battle over raising wages for hotel and airport workers in the city. Business groups fought to repeal the city’s $30 minimum wage for tourism workers but in early September fell short of securing the minimum number of valid signatures needed to qualify their initiative for the ballot.
Times staff writer David Zahniser contributed to this report.
The city of Los Angeles is exploring what would happen if the minimum wage of workers on residential construction projects was raised to more than $32 an hour.
At Tuesday morning’s City Council meeting, Councilmembers Curren Price and Hugo Soto-Martínez introduced a motion to commission a study on the effects of establishing a $32.35 minimum wage for all construction projects in the city with 10 or more residential units and under 85 feet in height.
The study would also analyze the effect of an additional healthcare credit of $7.65 per hour for construction workers on these projects.
The motion argues that lifting the floor on wages and benefits is necessary to attract workers amid pressures on the city to rebuild units lost during the Palisades fire — and as the industry hemorrhages workers leaving due to fears of immigration raids.
The motion already has sign-on from six council members: Bob Blumenfield, Heather Hutt, Eunisses Hernandez and Ysabel Jurado in addition to Price and Soto-Martínez.
A coalition of construction unions and housing groups including Abundant Housing LA and Housing Action Coalition has voiced its support for a wage increase.
Backers say that wage boosts are necessary to protect construction workers in the residential sector who are often non-union, foreign-born, and hired through multilayered contracting that makes them more vulnerable to wage theft and exploitation.
“These are workers who can’t afford a roof over their head, yet we rely on them to build the roofs over our own,” Pete Rodriguez, western district vice president of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters, said in a statement.
Some construction projects already require union-level pay, known as a “prevailing wage,” and benefits. Those projects would be exempt under the proposal.
Stuart Waldman, president of the Valley Industry and Commerce Assn., called the proposal “absolute insanity,” saying it would hurt a city already struggling to produce much-needed housing. Apartment developers already have been steering clear of L.A., in part due to Measure ULA, the voter-approved tax increase on high-end real estate sales, he said.
“This will drive what little construction we have out of L.A.,” Waldman added.
The council members’ proposal follows a recent battle over raising wages for hotel and airport workers in the city. Business groups fought to repeal the city’s $30 minimum wage for tourism workers but in early September fell short of securing the minimum number of valid signatures needed to qualify their initiative for the ballot.
Times staff writer David Zahniser contributed to this report.
The city of Los Angeles is exploring what would happen if the minimum wage of workers on residential construction projects was raised to more than $32 an hour.
At Tuesday morning’s City Council meeting, Councilmembers Curren Price and Hugo Soto-Martínez introduced a motion to commission a study on the effects of establishing a $32.35 minimum wage for all construction projects in the city with 10 or more residential units and under 85 feet in height.
The study would also analyze the effect of an additional healthcare credit of $7.65 per hour for construction workers on these projects.
The motion argues that lifting the floor on wages and benefits is necessary to attract workers amid pressures on the city to rebuild units lost during the Palisades fire — and as the industry hemorrhages workers leaving due to fears of immigration raids.
The motion already has sign-on from six council members: Bob Blumenfield, Heather Hutt, Eunisses Hernandez and Ysabel Jurado in addition to Price and Soto-Martínez.
A coalition of construction unions and housing groups including Abundant Housing LA and Housing Action Coalition has voiced its support for a wage increase.
Backers say that wage boosts are necessary to protect construction workers in the residential sector who are often non-union, foreign-born, and hired through multilayered contracting that makes them more vulnerable to wage theft and exploitation.
“These are workers who can’t afford a roof over their head, yet we rely on them to build the roofs over our own,” Pete Rodriguez, western district vice president of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters, said in a statement.
Some construction projects already require union-level pay, known as a “prevailing wage,” and benefits. Those projects would be exempt under the proposal.
Stuart Waldman, president of the Valley Industry and Commerce Assn., called the proposal “absolute insanity,” saying it would hurt a city already struggling to produce much-needed housing. Apartment developers already have been steering clear of L.A., in part due to Measure ULA, the voter-approved tax increase on high-end real estate sales, he said.
“This will drive what little construction we have out of L.A.,” Waldman added.
The council members’ proposal follows a recent battle over raising wages for hotel and airport workers in the city. Business groups fought to repeal the city’s $30 minimum wage for tourism workers but in early September fell short of securing the minimum number of valid signatures needed to qualify their initiative for the ballot.
Times staff writer David Zahniser contributed to this report.
The city of Los Angeles is exploring what would happen if the minimum wage of workers on residential construction projects was raised to more than $32 an hour.
At Tuesday morning’s City Council meeting, Councilmembers Curren Price and Hugo Soto-Martínez introduced a motion to commission a study on the effects of establishing a $32.35 minimum wage for all construction projects in the city with 10 or more residential units and under 85 feet in height.
The study would also analyze the effect of an additional healthcare credit of $7.65 per hour for construction workers on these projects.
The motion argues that lifting the floor on wages and benefits is necessary to attract workers amid pressures on the city to rebuild units lost during the Palisades fire — and as the industry hemorrhages workers leaving due to fears of immigration raids.
The motion already has sign-on from six council members: Bob Blumenfield, Heather Hutt, Eunisses Hernandez and Ysabel Jurado in addition to Price and Soto-Martínez.
A coalition of construction unions and housing groups including Abundant Housing LA and Housing Action Coalition has voiced its support for a wage increase.
Backers say that wage boosts are necessary to protect construction workers in the residential sector who are often non-union, foreign-born, and hired through multilayered contracting that makes them more vulnerable to wage theft and exploitation.
“These are workers who can’t afford a roof over their head, yet we rely on them to build the roofs over our own,” Pete Rodriguez, western district vice president of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters, said in a statement.
Some construction projects already require union-level pay, known as a “prevailing wage,” and benefits. Those projects would be exempt under the proposal.
Stuart Waldman, president of the Valley Industry and Commerce Assn., called the proposal “absolute insanity,” saying it would hurt a city already struggling to produce much-needed housing. Apartment developers already have been steering clear of L.A., in part due to Measure ULA, the voter-approved tax increase on high-end real estate sales, he said.
“This will drive what little construction we have out of L.A.,” Waldman added.
The council members’ proposal follows a recent battle over raising wages for hotel and airport workers in the city. Business groups fought to repeal the city’s $30 minimum wage for tourism workers but in early September fell short of securing the minimum number of valid signatures needed to qualify their initiative for the ballot.
Times staff writer David Zahniser contributed to this report.
The city of Los Angeles is exploring what would happen if the minimum wage of workers on residential construction projects was raised to more than $32 an hour.
At Tuesday morning’s City Council meeting, Councilmembers Curren Price and Hugo Soto-Martínez introduced a motion to commission a study on the effects of establishing a $32.35 minimum wage for all construction projects in the city with 10 or more residential units and under 85 feet in height.
The study would also analyze the effect of an additional healthcare credit of $7.65 per hour for construction workers on these projects.
The motion argues that lifting the floor on wages and benefits is necessary to attract workers amid pressures on the city to rebuild units lost during the Palisades fire — and as the industry hemorrhages workers leaving due to fears of immigration raids.
The motion already has sign-on from six council members: Bob Blumenfield, Heather Hutt, Eunisses Hernandez and Ysabel Jurado in addition to Price and Soto-Martínez.
A coalition of construction unions and housing groups including Abundant Housing LA and Housing Action Coalition has voiced its support for a wage increase.
Backers say that wage boosts are necessary to protect construction workers in the residential sector who are often non-union, foreign-born, and hired through multilayered contracting that makes them more vulnerable to wage theft and exploitation.
“These are workers who can’t afford a roof over their head, yet we rely on them to build the roofs over our own,” Pete Rodriguez, western district vice president of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters, said in a statement.
Some construction projects already require union-level pay, known as a “prevailing wage,” and benefits. Those projects would be exempt under the proposal.
Stuart Waldman, president of the Valley Industry and Commerce Assn., called the proposal “absolute insanity,” saying it would hurt a city already struggling to produce much-needed housing. Apartment developers already have been steering clear of L.A., in part due to Measure ULA, the voter-approved tax increase on high-end real estate sales, he said.
“This will drive what little construction we have out of L.A.,” Waldman added.
The council members’ proposal follows a recent battle over raising wages for hotel and airport workers in the city. Business groups fought to repeal the city’s $30 minimum wage for tourism workers but in early September fell short of securing the minimum number of valid signatures needed to qualify their initiative for the ballot.
Times staff writer David Zahniser contributed to this report.
The city of Los Angeles is exploring what would happen if the minimum wage of workers on residential construction projects was raised to more than $32 an hour.
At Tuesday morning’s City Council meeting, Councilmembers Curren Price and Hugo Soto-Martínez introduced a motion to commission a study on the effects of establishing a $32.35 minimum wage for all construction projects in the city with 10 or more residential units and under 85 feet in height.
The study would also analyze the effect of an additional healthcare credit of $7.65 per hour for construction workers on these projects.
The motion argues that lifting the floor on wages and benefits is necessary to attract workers amid pressures on the city to rebuild units lost during the Palisades fire — and as the industry hemorrhages workers leaving due to fears of immigration raids.
The motion already has sign-on from six council members: Bob Blumenfield, Heather Hutt, Eunisses Hernandez and Ysabel Jurado in addition to Price and Soto-Martínez.
A coalition of construction unions and housing groups including Abundant Housing LA and Housing Action Coalition has voiced its support for a wage increase.
Backers say that wage boosts are necessary to protect construction workers in the residential sector who are often non-union, foreign-born, and hired through multilayered contracting that makes them more vulnerable to wage theft and exploitation.
“These are workers who can’t afford a roof over their head, yet we rely on them to build the roofs over our own,” Pete Rodriguez, western district vice president of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters, said in a statement.
Some construction projects already require union-level pay, known as a “prevailing wage,” and benefits. Those projects would be exempt under the proposal.
Stuart Waldman, president of the Valley Industry and Commerce Assn., called the proposal “absolute insanity,” saying it would hurt a city already struggling to produce much-needed housing. Apartment developers already have been steering clear of L.A., in part due to Measure ULA, the voter-approved tax increase on high-end real estate sales, he said.
“This will drive what little construction we have out of L.A.,” Waldman added.
The council members’ proposal follows a recent battle over raising wages for hotel and airport workers in the city. Business groups fought to repeal the city’s $30 minimum wage for tourism workers but in early September fell short of securing the minimum number of valid signatures needed to qualify their initiative for the ballot.
Times staff writer David Zahniser contributed to this report.
The city of Los Angeles is exploring what would happen if the minimum wage of workers on residential construction projects was raised to more than $32 an hour.
At Tuesday morning’s City Council meeting, Councilmembers Curren Price and Hugo Soto-Martínez introduced a motion to commission a study on the effects of establishing a $32.35 minimum wage for all construction projects in the city with 10 or more residential units and under 85 feet in height.
The study would also analyze the effect of an additional healthcare credit of $7.65 per hour for construction workers on these projects.
The motion argues that lifting the floor on wages and benefits is necessary to attract workers amid pressures on the city to rebuild units lost during the Palisades fire — and as the industry hemorrhages workers leaving due to fears of immigration raids.
The motion already has sign-on from six council members: Bob Blumenfield, Heather Hutt, Eunisses Hernandez and Ysabel Jurado in addition to Price and Soto-Martínez.
A coalition of construction unions and housing groups including Abundant Housing LA and Housing Action Coalition has voiced its support for a wage increase.
Backers say that wage boosts are necessary to protect construction workers in the residential sector who are often non-union, foreign-born, and hired through multilayered contracting that makes them more vulnerable to wage theft and exploitation.
“These are workers who can’t afford a roof over their head, yet we rely on them to build the roofs over our own,” Pete Rodriguez, western district vice president of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters, said in a statement.
Some construction projects already require union-level pay, known as a “prevailing wage,” and benefits. Those projects would be exempt under the proposal.
Stuart Waldman, president of the Valley Industry and Commerce Assn., called the proposal “absolute insanity,” saying it would hurt a city already struggling to produce much-needed housing. Apartment developers already have been steering clear of L.A., in part due to Measure ULA, the voter-approved tax increase on high-end real estate sales, he said.
“This will drive what little construction we have out of L.A.,” Waldman added.
The council members’ proposal follows a recent battle over raising wages for hotel and airport workers in the city. Business groups fought to repeal the city’s $30 minimum wage for tourism workers but in early September fell short of securing the minimum number of valid signatures needed to qualify their initiative for the ballot.
Times staff writer David Zahniser contributed to this report.
The city of Los Angeles is exploring what would happen if the minimum wage of workers on residential construction projects was raised to more than $32 an hour.
At Tuesday morning’s City Council meeting, Councilmembers Curren Price and Hugo Soto-Martínez introduced a motion to commission a study on the effects of establishing a $32.35 minimum wage for all construction projects in the city with 10 or more residential units and under 85 feet in height.
The study would also analyze the effect of an additional healthcare credit of $7.65 per hour for construction workers on these projects.
The motion argues that lifting the floor on wages and benefits is necessary to attract workers amid pressures on the city to rebuild units lost during the Palisades fire — and as the industry hemorrhages workers leaving due to fears of immigration raids.
The motion already has sign-on from six council members: Bob Blumenfield, Heather Hutt, Eunisses Hernandez and Ysabel Jurado in addition to Price and Soto-Martínez.
A coalition of construction unions and housing groups including Abundant Housing LA and Housing Action Coalition has voiced its support for a wage increase.
Backers say that wage boosts are necessary to protect construction workers in the residential sector who are often non-union, foreign-born, and hired through multilayered contracting that makes them more vulnerable to wage theft and exploitation.
“These are workers who can’t afford a roof over their head, yet we rely on them to build the roofs over our own,” Pete Rodriguez, western district vice president of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters, said in a statement.
Some construction projects already require union-level pay, known as a “prevailing wage,” and benefits. Those projects would be exempt under the proposal.
Stuart Waldman, president of the Valley Industry and Commerce Assn., called the proposal “absolute insanity,” saying it would hurt a city already struggling to produce much-needed housing. Apartment developers already have been steering clear of L.A., in part due to Measure ULA, the voter-approved tax increase on high-end real estate sales, he said.
“This will drive what little construction we have out of L.A.,” Waldman added.
The council members’ proposal follows a recent battle over raising wages for hotel and airport workers in the city. Business groups fought to repeal the city’s $30 minimum wage for tourism workers but in early September fell short of securing the minimum number of valid signatures needed to qualify their initiative for the ballot.
Times staff writer David Zahniser contributed to this report.
The city of Los Angeles is exploring what would happen if the minimum wage of workers on residential construction projects was raised to more than $32 an hour.
At Tuesday morning’s City Council meeting, Councilmembers Curren Price and Hugo Soto-Martínez introduced a motion to commission a study on the effects of establishing a $32.35 minimum wage for all construction projects in the city with 10 or more residential units and under 85 feet in height.
The study would also analyze the effect of an additional healthcare credit of $7.65 per hour for construction workers on these projects.
The motion argues that lifting the floor on wages and benefits is necessary to attract workers amid pressures on the city to rebuild units lost during the Palisades fire — and as the industry hemorrhages workers leaving due to fears of immigration raids.
The motion already has sign-on from six council members: Bob Blumenfield, Heather Hutt, Eunisses Hernandez and Ysabel Jurado in addition to Price and Soto-Martínez.
A coalition of construction unions and housing groups including Abundant Housing LA and Housing Action Coalition has voiced its support for a wage increase.
Backers say that wage boosts are necessary to protect construction workers in the residential sector who are often non-union, foreign-born, and hired through multilayered contracting that makes them more vulnerable to wage theft and exploitation.
“These are workers who can’t afford a roof over their head, yet we rely on them to build the roofs over our own,” Pete Rodriguez, western district vice president of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters, said in a statement.
Some construction projects already require union-level pay, known as a “prevailing wage,” and benefits. Those projects would be exempt under the proposal.
Stuart Waldman, president of the Valley Industry and Commerce Assn., called the proposal “absolute insanity,” saying it would hurt a city already struggling to produce much-needed housing. Apartment developers already have been steering clear of L.A., in part due to Measure ULA, the voter-approved tax increase on high-end real estate sales, he said.
“This will drive what little construction we have out of L.A.,” Waldman added.
The council members’ proposal follows a recent battle over raising wages for hotel and airport workers in the city. Business groups fought to repeal the city’s $30 minimum wage for tourism workers but in early September fell short of securing the minimum number of valid signatures needed to qualify their initiative for the ballot.
Times staff writer David Zahniser contributed to this report.
The city of Los Angeles is exploring what would happen if the minimum wage of workers on residential construction projects was raised to more than $32 an hour.
At Tuesday morning’s City Council meeting, Councilmembers Curren Price and Hugo Soto-Martínez introduced a motion to commission a study on the effects of establishing a $32.35 minimum wage for all construction projects in the city with 10 or more residential units and under 85 feet in height.
The study would also analyze the effect of an additional healthcare credit of $7.65 per hour for construction workers on these projects.
The motion argues that lifting the floor on wages and benefits is necessary to attract workers amid pressures on the city to rebuild units lost during the Palisades fire — and as the industry hemorrhages workers leaving due to fears of immigration raids.
The motion already has sign-on from six council members: Bob Blumenfield, Heather Hutt, Eunisses Hernandez and Ysabel Jurado in addition to Price and Soto-Martínez.
A coalition of construction unions and housing groups including Abundant Housing LA and Housing Action Coalition has voiced its support for a wage increase.
Backers say that wage boosts are necessary to protect construction workers in the residential sector who are often non-union, foreign-born, and hired through multilayered contracting that makes them more vulnerable to wage theft and exploitation.
“These are workers who can’t afford a roof over their head, yet we rely on them to build the roofs over our own,” Pete Rodriguez, western district vice president of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters, said in a statement.
Some construction projects already require union-level pay, known as a “prevailing wage,” and benefits. Those projects would be exempt under the proposal.
Stuart Waldman, president of the Valley Industry and Commerce Assn., called the proposal “absolute insanity,” saying it would hurt a city already struggling to produce much-needed housing. Apartment developers already have been steering clear of L.A., in part due to Measure ULA, the voter-approved tax increase on high-end real estate sales, he said.
“This will drive what little construction we have out of L.A.,” Waldman added.
The council members’ proposal follows a recent battle over raising wages for hotel and airport workers in the city. Business groups fought to repeal the city’s $30 minimum wage for tourism workers but in early September fell short of securing the minimum number of valid signatures needed to qualify their initiative for the ballot.
Times staff writer David Zahniser contributed to this report.
